That’s good.Ī final similarity is the Lord of the Rings’ trope. Both write ups keep that shroud in place. Plus, dropping a shroud over what these intelware systems can deliver is quite important in my opinion. However, the “doing good” is often cheek by jowl with “making money.” Keeping control of proprietary features is also important.
#Ibm i2 analyst notebook vs palantir software#
Specialized software like i2 clones are useful, and they are not code confections I want to see available to bad actors. Most people involved in LE and intel embrace the idea that bad actors can exert a negative influence on some society cohorts. Based on my limited knowledge, the “doing good” thing is indeed a factor for those working on Analyst’s Notebook and Palantir Gotham. That’s important to me and probably no one else.Īnother similarity is that the theme of doing good runs through both write ups. Palantir tailored an i2-type method for US intel professionals. Again, the differences are not germane beyond the point that i2 refined the use of software to assist UK LE. based its approach around the work processes of UK law enforcement. Palantir anchored its system on techniques in use at a US intelligence agency more than a decade ago.
But in terms of functionality, both ingest information and provide outputs useful to those interested in entities (banks, people, and other proper noun type things). The differences between Analyst’s Notebook and Palantir Gotham can still trigger inter-agency memo battles among LE and intel professionals. Palantir was less a seeing stone than a step beyond what is now IBM’s i2 Analyst’s Notebook, one of the grandpeople of today’s policeware and intelware systems. Some of these “founders” are quite fascinating individuals. What seems to have slipped through the cracks is the information the Silicon Valley-centric team formed around Peter Thiel has been ignored. For practical purposes, they are close enough for horse shoes. First, the origin story of Palantir is similar. There are some similarities between the two write ups. Yep, another “real” news report about the company, and this one has nifty graphics. Is it dangerous to let this software know so much?” appeared in print. Alas, the New York Times’s reporter never called me, but what’s new? On Sunday, October 25, 2020, the Times’s profile “ The All Seeing Eye: Palantir became a tech giant by helping governments and law enforcement decipher vast amounts of data.
#Ibm i2 analyst notebook vs palantir full#
But is its crystal ball just smoke and mirrors?” - was chock full of information about Palantir Technologies.
That story - “ Techie Software Soldier Spy: Palantir, Big Data’s scariest, most secretive unicorn, is going public. Not long ago, I was interviewed for a “real” news story about Palantir which appeared in New York Magazine in late September 2020.
0 kommentar(er)
